Sampson Onwuka.....
II
Any organizational structure that is using Austin as primitive name or has reasons to work for Austin and compensated by Austin is not a private property, won’t that religious persecutions are serious allegations that should be taken on a face level. This high exhibition (exhibitionism) of 'uncivil rites' its cult pornography and initiation is completely banned in both US and in Mexico and by Austin Statute and Texas Laws, all the parties involved may be feeling strong about their abuse of process but not for long. Speaking of burning American flags, it is Holmes, Oliver Wendell Holmes that you need to resurrect since his position for and against first amendment rights and extreme speech is item that covers the individual rights to personal property, image, identity, flags, etc.
You have to resurrect August Belmont of 5th Avenue New York that only lends away from the rest of us the fact that burning effigies in any reasons are material considerations for fires and intent as burning house as means of inciting public hate or similar emotions or Arson as the incidents of riots may suggest. To these groups you need to resurrect D.L Moody and his church is their issues and protest against the ‘uncivil rites’. Do not accept my words, perhaps some things need not be discussed but District Attorneys and Police Detective – at least in Austin - are not supposed to know everything, including Citizens, but 'Uncivil Rites' and amelioration of a private's 'Image' 'Effigy' and Statutory, inversion of his primacy and invasion of privacy are acts that are its impermissible by law anywhere and cannot be that different from Austin.
Unless the D.A’s and her assistance are telling us too much, that such actions are permissible with referencing the laws, directly and derisively, their silence its adequate and such act my continue but there is nothing that paints a bad picture of human condition than a mother and child. Some action however devious constitutes acute personal deformation even with consent from both parties given the thresholds of exhibition, but you are so smart that it was a child that is the cause of these problems. Perhaps you can please everybody all you have to do is try harder. Some of the initiative administered by the Health Sciences in Austin is not blameless some of it are just downright illegal.
But the forms of agreement between the City of Austin and the department which administer health science involve the false and misleading use of Neuro-apathy as a way to sensitize the intended object. But for the fact that it is used for control reasons in certain privileged situation, the total estimate and worth of such exercise is something that can be investigated from the perspective of damages to a patient in Psychology. That the issue of self-medication is really with meanings of definition on the nature of self-help involving person to person therapy and the early stages and not later of unemployment and not later. It does not mean that the therapy for job hunting as getting over any job works for everyone, or that it should be applied with all intent until the patient is fractured. It seems that what UTA and the authors of some of the guide for Health Science and mental health left out these lengthy discourses on the abuse and criminal application of the process.
There are no doubts that a panel of six judges passes an informed position on anybody that such a person is mentally struggling and deficient, even if such a person is the most astute and mentally healthy individual he or she is automatically insane or bordering on such précis. Here’s the picture, there is a saying that attributed to Einstein about doing the same thing over and through and expecting a good result can be considered madness or insanity. This saying has given additional impetus on the people pushing the limits of the health department to a whole different level and it is experienced by different people and for different kinds of reasons.
A part of the human brain essentially dies to sustain other parts of the brain, and like the chances in the many parts of the world, we must great pleasures in observing these. Sickness differs from disease since the first is the product of conditions and may alleviate its suffering when circumstances change, but a disease is more than any infirmity, it has a causing agent – perhaps a germ or protozoa. This is no doubt similar to areas of psychology that deals with aging process. For instance a man is sick from old age does not mean he is diseased, but some conditions of the body may no longer support itself and its system and it becomes vulnerable to all forms of transitive situations.
A woman may be considered sick for other reasons than disease causing agent, for instance a degenerative condition of the heart or the brain or forms of neurosis may permanently force this woman into actions that are extremely dangerous to the conscience of the general society. Fact is, the changes from aging is slow and therefore not visible, they gradually accumulate and like incontinent conditions fecal edifice, these patients do everywhere and it is perfectly normal – at least for the most of it. We may not therefore pretend that some of the changes in the life of anyone should be permitted to enter the life of others, to the degree that such a person and their privileged positioned inspire social sickness whose symptoms are neurosis and the outcomes depended on actions or our failure to act in the any such circumstances.
We may suggest that the saying that human beings return to a past as a way to refresh their minds on the present conditions of happiness are issues of neurosis, that some actions that impact these victims usually transit between the brain and the motor neurons, and each information system a question of the human synapses and memory which increases with age and in age serve as nerve system with great experience and exposure of what they call adaptation. Humans adapt to their environment because of our body and in most cases because of the Chromosome 5, but if in the course of one’s aging process with layers and layers of dead and acquired information that some action and incident exceed what we are used, this incident in whatever form they occur remain a very permanent mark in the life of any victim.
Put in differently, neurologically pathways are information reservoirs and memory synapses that can be injured and therefore revert to pain and in the failure of the victim to overcome it, it reverts to suffering. One of the more enduring problems of human sex hormones is the ability of the body to reproduce. It is not a mystery that we age in time and the reasons are well known, however, we wonder at the reasons why release of protein from the body through the reproductive systems, for instance the male through the penis elixirs such joy in coming. You utterly wasted after half an hour and need another half to recover and then a wasting and circle is repeated. Perhaps the statement bring to mind some ancient saying that sex was no less than what it is a process of transduction, a process of nihilistic reduction that gives the impression death, dying and perhaps a rejuvenation.
This type-cast is not new in psychology that reproduction was also a process of decay and death.
All life is death - all nature decay – is perhaps within the meaning that the release of any energy is commingled to some ultimate oblivion, but we are aware of this transition since from our rejuvenation we notice a difference. Eventually it comes to an end, but for trying, life continues. What we are looking at is what happens to a body when it is already in very bad state – at least approached puberty and then the unstoppable and immortalization nerve pounding hormones to let go. Sex at this statement may be enjoyable – even for another 60 years of its career where people share stories of their past, and who shared with whom, when, and how.
The issue is that the brain is best able to release any hints of pleasure or so called pleasure because it has matured and the release of energy for any number of reason would be a new and released tendency which the nerves and the body experiences and for the men, releasing the spermatozoa, was a form of life from decay and that injures a part of the buried neurological information which the brain in adaptive episodes of the environment is forced to reverse triggering a release which the body experiences for a moment as a kindly sensation. For a fact that experience this new decay with its primary and put it differently, if we, for instance the men, as perhaps the women, began like urethra to release this liquid and protein from the body at a very early age, almost from childbirth, like the urine and the effects whose pleasurable release still linger till old age, sex and release of spermatozoa may or may be that desirable and pleasurable.
It is true that the author has made some careful ovation on the plurality of unemployment and human habits and has written about unemployment process and the demands of being a patient as equal and similar, but being a patient of habit does not arise from unemployment but the brain like the human body can souse its elder injuries and memories buried deep. The intellectual approach for instance to the lasting issue of American urban life and perpetual underclass – if any – is a surgical procedure into the past with no intentions of removing the cancer with no means of advising new models from old. In some sense, human habits begin with unusual experience and ends differently.
In command of this basic understanding on how for sexual experience for instance rape injures the brain, we see from a matter better choice which can hold its ground to the end and the serious problem of injuries to the body of the least suspecting individual. The main fact is that rape as a war material does not disfigure from humbling psychological processes especially when past and forgotten experience is soused without notice. A harshly spoken word to a life-long partner can conjure dislocating images from the past, can injure and sometimes per-force behavioral aptitude no longer at least with normal people whose behaviors are equally exaggerated. But these individuals may choose to perhaps prolong their pain or exaggerate the injury which others inflicted on them. But the discomfiture do not deny the acceptance that some injuries are necessary, but a riddle or perhaps a joke, bitter revelations and perhaps truth can be handled differently and with wry and aplomb.
Altogether, the leading psychological indexing and principle vicar reasons for using a therapy is to expose the more hidden and more reserved bunion of original intents and ugly past which determines an existence and in various aspects suffers us from exercising psychological freedom. There is an error among the eagles of human psychology that tends to emphasize over-active psychology and loud display as a psychology dimension worthy of some treatment, perhaps a form of embolism and anal penetration and other forms of Freudian sexual therapy for hysteria which does not meet the intent for such a therapy. For some reasons, the past through which we see the future is psychological reversed, does not mean that we see it the future from the past only upside down, rather there is some experience about the past we see from a time light no longer at ease. It is a classic case of sense defense and perhaps the most idea behind the issues of self-preservation – argued by first class psychologist such as Henry James as the one most enduring laws of nature.
But the parallax error is mistaken as obviate mathematical of logical proceeding, and we bargain that the logical inertia which catapults an oneiric from a first speak of human intuition and sensory experiences send us from the center of inner gravity to a future that is not exactly possible without our presence. For all intended purpose this experience and the reserve –psychology as from Michael Fouquet (?) is sensation is one vitae, a vista that excludes the irrelevant from the vastly unusual and allows the better part of human nature or like Pinker’s ‘Better Angels’ meet us at center of social discourse and in narrating human reaction to human situation, we create a hero from the past. What is the struggle of understanding human beings since the creation of the very divine logos – which George Steiner once argued to have started perhaps in the Garden of Eden or when Adam heard the first voice or perhaps as I argued that it was buried in Adam’s response to the question.
In all reality, we could bend backwards on the assumptions we are part of an experience that higher but the experience in all probability is either an injury to what we are used to or an exercise that has no meeting point saving the purpose it serves. It imposes a reasonable doubt scenario to a position taken by any group of experts on any subject under the sky that the assumptions and final results are perhaps the better judge of any recommendations- however primitive and however bitter. For sure the few, who recover in Health Science industries from even the least forms of relapsing, are not just grateful but are sometimes with the assurance the least came with the most and sometime unnecessary sacrifice. Be-deviled from a therapy which we all need, we experience great difficulties in straying from a record and perhaps a history and above all, we stray only slightly from hints of contamination within the scope of decision making process.
Habits are a conscious departure from routine is not routine as conscious departure from process. It looks to suggest here that acquired human behavior is usually susceptible is pruning the determinant fiber of once psychology, the past, the infancy, the experiences of a tender age and psycho-analysis of a gifted redoubtable serve a purpose in understanding human experiences. But the inoculation which it prunes is not an article of history or should be relegated to Psychology or forms the basic oasis of human ineluctable. It seems to do at better ends of experience, as part of recollection but tethers on some humbling experiences – this humbling process is better placed from human experience, and the patient struggles against time to let go but in the end, experiences something varied but not the same in some far we can argue against the very discipline of psychology.
We bargain here that the total knowledge from the total academic disciplines available to these humans who have struggled against one obstacle from beginning of the brain development converge in two three process, the beginning, the construct and the end. It is the I and thou psychology of facing the very object in our immediate purview that animates a sense of judging and accessing, that such and such persons of interest is lacking in this and in that. This is not the best argument on self-preservation or does flirt with conceptions of God or divinity or does place second pole of understanding or revealing in the idea of speech, response or self-defense which is the engine of the divine logos.
Perhaps somewhere in the evolution of human psychology as anthropologists argue we moved from seeing what in front of us or binary exchange between us and the object of confusion to a different part of human thing, one that identifies no just thou and I – best for origins of covenant and survival trend or covenant as survival trend – but to what lies behind us and our side. This aspect which forms the bases on how we now generalize on others is a human construct cannot be redeemed from one solution or buried under the asymptotic panoply that one solution is for all.
All laws of abstraction which the process of inquiry does not sponsor or defeat the limits psychology is that inquiry which ends with the three mode of investigation is an item which is found in the I and thou theorem, a classic factor that requires some one and one meeting and the narrating that attempts to expose the past and release the object from its injuries. But if the only form of third angle understanding in human thinking, perhaps a third polar tent in the intellectual diagram is indeed an item of the third person which others, than abstraction cannot exist without examples or without imitations of nature, it is therefore an abstraction – the gut of Art and altogether artificial.
There is therefore no beginning and no end in narrating certain ideological influences, but for all intent of forcing some experience to perpetuate an ideology, we may occasional souse other problems no longer an affair in one’s life. This a lateral measure of human discipline and it buries the better of human nature in the least possible format, that abstraction in psychology without the matters of hysteria which are temporary are questions one’s environment and exhibit of one’s authority in any class of respect and privilege.
All privilege is equal to one ultimate ends, the advantage.
For some treatment which need not specify the spectra of some experiences with intent at directly or derisively reductionist, should not be held any longer than necessary in the process of some delivery than for instance War Veterans of most colors of the world experience different things and for different reasons and are required to endure a counselor in the Army or elsewhere do not always push the limits of their own ability or do feel trapped by a past. We can argue that the experience of some sort, of forcing obvious negative reaction from others are no articles of psychology are in fact primitive human behavior and in the end, it leads to several ends, one of it’s the destruction of intent or temptation, or in different language lust, that the end result is a streak for an end, how slowly is how well we understand primitive psychology and nihilism, whereas Freud and Nietzsche measures the ending as death in gradual escape.
We look from a second angle, that all pains are one way or another degrees of experiences that enables the logically assessment of human experience to harass the rate of exposure and in the end, translate the exposure from one layer of synaptic energy, muscles and memory to another, where is injuries which are similar tend to fracture the body involuntary ability and may not create as much pain as some pain but due to the relationship between speech and logic and logic to the brain’s ability to arrange and access an exposure, may lead us into action and reactions that arise from the failure to justify some action.
In the fifties it was thought that the brain has several parts that act as a buffer for several activities, but as time proceeded, it gradually became clear that the brain is a series of interconnected systems sending, receiving and analyzing information. If we suggest that a certain biologist Walter Rudolf Hess was the architect of this new ideology, it may miss the point about the person and persons who made the general argument about the brain are part of his general dogma. How can this be? The study of the human brain has occupied our anxiety and curiosity from day one. Human brain function even from early stages or embryonic stages is based on certain series of receptacles, especially 26th week during which the residues from the developing embryo settles at the primitive streak coalescing into what is called the Spine which attaches new nerve system from the spine to the fallopian tubes.
It exposes the hair duct and we experience sensory messages from the end of the residue to the ends of function of human gene and protein expressing the legs and the hands. But the bones are the earliest calcite from the body too junior to release from the blood and body and other bi-product which the baby also needs, and then the nerve evolve attached to the brain and with exposure and experience, we also begin to reaction from the brain after the past 11 through 26 weeks, and from this period, much of the actions that body takes, especially in nerve ending and suicide missions of the cells and protein which must die and part ways to allow the fingers and the toes to form separately is controlled by the reverse reaction from the end of nerve system barricade against the mother in position at embryo through the residual olfactory of human west and calcium which insulate against over-production or rapid and unchecked profligate division of the cells. Long story long, the body assumes the shape at the embryo and forbids injuries during pregnancy and after, and the brain serves as the director as both the insulations and for information processing.
The activity of the motor neurons which take over the body and the intermediate psychology of human beings from this period, returns to this formative structure and through the use of the noise which these nerve generate the sensitive nature of human experience from birth and environment is gifted new meaning and new significance, but the body does not sway from this course in all its developmental levels. One of the left over characteristics of not only early development of the brain and human body is what happens during specific eponym of child development. We are no strangers to a child development up to the age of 12, - probably the best years of any human which differs from other animals, indicating that a child is owned for life if damages are done to his to her brain at this period. One of such instance is the current President of United States – Barrack Obama – raised in both United States and Asia, has not since his 11th and 12th year departed from his experiences which is no different from the embryonic experiences and the death of a process for instance the birth.
The tendency of all human beings to per-force a perpetual class is within the injuries and information exposed to at this period particularly the environment, the community and the public media houses, an item well known by all and asunder but here with more meaning, we place these strange origins on human existence and intellectual development as a period that is slightly devoid of nature, devoid of the biological development saving for one thing, that body assumes its mode at this period and merely duplicate as the days pass. Of course character by virtue of all assessment, Piaget to mention, encourage better behavioral exposures between ages 12 and 18 when most characters are formed. These are no items that dissimilar from the formalities of brain functions, but attitudes to even sex and sexuality is given several definition and ammunition, ending differently or variously as the alter of social motivations. ….
One point must be taken into account about this multi-functional nature of the brain systems and that has to embryonic stages of the brain. In some sense the organizer principle of the Hans Spemann seem relatively through that despite the view that the brain act for several reactions and for prolonged period of time, it the gradual evolution of the brain that is actually important. But in response to speech and patterns of speech, the work of Walter Hess, former professor Emeritus after ‘34 years of research and teaching at the University of Zurich’ that enough separation of the action potential of the cerebrum in relation to expression seem entirely demonstrated from the standpoint of biological arrangement of human brain and the mind which is a recollection or better exercise of all information processed in reverse like the eyes and the what it captures; it captures in reverse – upside down. This part of nature that need be unduly damaged to expose to extreme experiences of all types and all classes that is quite second to our nature or what makes human, that an injury is relative and what is relative is not an inquiry, beyond the I and thou theorem, that it meets us separately that human nature is an abstraction.
Human nature is governed by many things which is nearly all of it is experience and these experiences are relative. But the length and depth of any experience does not with exposure and what the body is used to, it is how the body is introduced to some experience if any that determines its verity, its outcome and its results. If the rehearse backwards, a forced reaction or expensive coaxing leads from something that it has a way of justifying its effect and this effect need to be looked into especially the psychological level of the individual or the patient. I take a case of Sexual activity and innuendo as
